πŸ›‘οΈ Risks & Securit

While NeuraLink emphasizes decentralization, collaboration, and transparency, the system must actively manage risks across technical, economic, governance, and ethical dimensions.


10.1 Technical Risks

πŸ›  Fake Simulation Results & Cheating Malicious nodes may submit falsified model outputs or automate fake contributions.

Mitigations:

  • Proof-of-Training (PoT) and cross-node result verification

  • Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) or Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP)

  • Redundant simulation tasks and multi-party challenge systems


πŸ“¦ Data Poisoning & Low-Quality Inputs Low-value or misleading data may pollute model performance.

Mitigations:

  • Minimum quality thresholds for data uploads

  • Reputation scoring for data contributors

  • Community-driven data validation and labeling bounties


πŸ” Model Divergence & Non-Reproducibility Lack of coordination may result in fragmented model versions or unverifiable outcomes.

Mitigations:

  • On-chain versioning with ModelID + CommitHash

  • Fork/Merge support and metadata transparency

  • Required parameter trace logging for publication


10.2 Economic Risks

🎯 Reward Abuse & Task Farming Users or bots may exploit tasks for unearned rewards.

Mitigations:

  • CAPTCHA or behavioral validation

  • Dynamic weightings based on task rarity and contributor history

  • Penalties or cooldowns for low-value or repetitive behavior


πŸ“‰ Token Volatility & Overdependence Heavy reliance on token incentives may affect long-term sustainability.

Mitigations:

  • Treasury stabilization pool funded by usage fees

  • Partial rewards in stable assets or value-locked Neura

  • Dynamic emission caps linked to activity and revenue


10.3 Governance Risks

πŸ—³ Governance Takeover or Proposal Attacks Wealthy actors could dominate votes or submit harmful proposals.

Mitigations:

  • Time-weighted voting with staking delay

  • Hybrid voting (token + reputation)

  • Emergency multisig veto committee (initial phases only)


πŸͺ“ DAO Splits or Protocol Forks Disagreements could fragment community consensus.

Mitigations:

  • Proposal quorum + discussion periods

  • DAO-managed soft fork migration tools

  • Model migration tooling with version inheritance


10.4 Ethical & Output Risks

⚠️ Model Misuse or Harmful Content Open-source models could be trained to produce misinformation, bias, or harmful outputs.

Mitigations:

  • DAO-based model review system

  • On-chain invocation tracking and usage scoring

  • Governance rules for banning, modifying, or restricting unethical models


NeuraLink’s risk framework is continuously evolving. All critical system parameters and mitigations will be subject to DAO oversight and upgradable through community consensus.

Last updated